L2j logic...
Forum rules
READ NOW: L2j Forums Rules of Conduct
READ NOW: L2j Forums Rules of Conduct
- Gladicek
- Posts: 634
- Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 6:25 pm
- Location: Czech Republic
L2j logic...
Still I donť get your logic. All the time you ASK for author agreement for share. Since Gnacik wrote 2x times that it can be shared then I did it. And what happened? Of course deleted because of ????. Sorry but I donť get your logic.
Can someone who have IQ explain this ? Because I donť get it. You wrote only about that it will not be commitable but nothing about that canť be shared.
If this will happend again then I want to remove my work from your project because its only ..... me again and again. This is maybe why ppls support more others forks that L2j.
Thx for your answer and waiting for warning or something else like always.
Can someone who have IQ explain this ? Because I donť get it. You wrote only about that it will not be commitable but nothing about that canť be shared.
If this will happend again then I want to remove my work from your project because its only ..... me again and again. This is maybe why ppls support more others forks that L2j.
Thx for your answer and waiting for warning or something else like always.
L2J retired
- MELERIX
- L2j Veteran
- Posts: 6667
- Joined: Sat Sep 23, 2006 11:31 pm
- Location: Chile
- Contact:
- UnAfraid
- L2j Veteran
- Posts: 4199
- Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2007 4:25 pm
- Location: Bulgaria
- Contact:
- Zoey76
- L2j Inner Circle
- Posts: 7005
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 3:36 am
Re: L2j logic...
I'll assume that Freya is based in leaked/stolen files, since I never saw Gnacik sharing it.
According to the rules, it won't get committed.
If you get Gnacik to post his version in forums, then we can talk again.
According to the rules, it won't get committed.
If you get Gnacik to post his version in forums, then we can talk again.
Powered by Eclipse 4.30 | Eclipse Temurin 21 | MariaDB 11.3.2 | L2J Server 2.6.3.0 - High Five
Join our Discord!
Join our Discord!
- Gladicek
- Posts: 634
- Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 6:25 pm
- Location: Czech Republic
Re: L2j logic...
When someone stolen it that donť mean that I did it too lol. I get it from L2j United dev by normal way + Gnacik give me agreement for sharing his work which I just upgraded to much more retail like. ¨Zoey76 wrote:I'll assume that Freya is based in leaked/stolen files, since I never saw Gnacik sharing it.
According to the rules, it won't get committed.
If you get Gnacik to post his version in forums, then we can talk again.
There are more scripts which are leaked and stolen and they were not removed. So what is this? You really make me angry with this.
L2J retired
- Zoey76
- L2j Inner Circle
- Posts: 7005
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 3:36 am
Re: L2j logic...
Don't get angry, is not worth it.
Just get Gnacik to share it and it'll be all right.
Just get Gnacik to share it and it'll be all right.
Powered by Eclipse 4.30 | Eclipse Temurin 21 | MariaDB 11.3.2 | L2J Server 2.6.3.0 - High Five
Join our Discord!
Join our Discord!
- Gladicek
- Posts: 634
- Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 6:25 pm
- Location: Czech Republic
Re: L2j logic...
Why I should get it ? He told me to share it omg. Iť same script just upgraded (better version because that before was missing some parts which I added).Zoey76 wrote:Don't get angry, is not worth it.
Just get Gnacik to share it and it'll be all right.
He give me agreement and give agreement because it have my own parts in script. So where is problem?
BTW: Iť same like with Beleth script which commited L2j....
L2J retired
- MELERIX
- L2j Veteran
- Posts: 6667
- Joined: Sat Sep 23, 2006 11:31 pm
- Location: Chile
- Contact:
Re: L2j logic...
this is simple, where is the proof ?
l2ju is a private project, so gnacik should talk here and confirm if that authorization is true.
remember that source code of leaked stuff is not allowed here, and as always will be deleted and never committed.
l2ju is a private project, so gnacik should talk here and confirm if that authorization is true.
remember that source code of leaked stuff is not allowed here, and as always will be deleted and never committed.
- Gladicek
- Posts: 634
- Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 6:25 pm
- Location: Czech Republic
Re: L2j logic...
And our server was in L2jUnited project so we were able to get source code. If you donť know nothing about this then please donť event post about itMELERIX wrote:this is simple, where is the proof ?
l2ju is a private project, so gnacik should talk here and confirm if that authorization is true.
remember that source code of leaked stuff is not allowed here, and as always will be deleted and never committed.
JIV and maybe even lion can confirm this...
L2J retired
- MELERIX
- L2j Veteran
- Posts: 6667
- Joined: Sat Sep 23, 2006 11:31 pm
- Location: Chile
- Contact:
Re: L2j logic...
that doesn't matter, for example I can have access to another SVN project and that doesn't mean I can pikup stuff from there and share that in other forums, without authorization.
so I'm still for wating proofs, or Ganacik confirmation about if true that you are authorized to share stuff from l2ju here
so I'm still for wating proofs, or Ganacik confirmation about if true that you are authorized to share stuff from l2ju here
- Gladicek
- Posts: 634
- Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 6:25 pm
- Location: Czech Republic
Re: L2j logic...
viewtopic.php?f=4&t=26635
Check this topic before you will post please. It look as that you donť read it.
Check this topic before you will post please. It look as that you donť read it.
L2J retired
- MELERIX
- L2j Veteran
- Posts: 6667
- Joined: Sat Sep 23, 2006 11:31 pm
- Location: Chile
- Contact:
Re: L2j logic...
seems you have not readed the last answer there ?
Zoey76 wrote:I just made up my mind, like I said before none version will be committed, they aren't public, they haven't been shared by the author and they have a lot of drama behind.
-
- L2j Veteran
- Posts: 967
- Joined: Sun Mar 11, 2007 7:49 pm
- Location: Ukraine
Re: L2j logic...
JIV start server with wrong people thats why some people get source, and then shareGladicek wrote: JIV and maybe even lion can confirm this...
- Gladicek
- Posts: 634
- Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 6:25 pm
- Location: Czech Republic
Re: L2j logic...
You wrote only about that it will not be commitable but nothing about that canť be shared.MELERIX wrote:seems you have not readed the last answer there ?
Zoey76 wrote:I just made up my mind, like I said before none version will be committed, they aren't public, they haven't been shared by the author and they have a lot of drama behind.
There was leaked Beleth script (Threat version) and was not removed so how your logic work?
I didnť shared anything. Only now I want to share it because Gnacik give me agreement about sharing his Freya script.lion wrote:JIV start server with wrong people thats why some people get source, and then shareGladicek wrote: JIV and maybe even lion can confirm this...
L2J retired
-
- L2j Veteran
- Posts: 967
- Joined: Sun Mar 11, 2007 7:49 pm
- Location: Ukraine
Re: L2j logic...
i don't say it is was you. you get script - this is already leak. and our source leaked from exfire, but this is not place for talk about that, we must stop talk about this.Gladicek wrote: I didnť shared anything.
This script was done by Gnacik with little midification by me and Sandro. Gnacik agree share freya.java for show this is his own work.