L2j logic...

If something doesn't fit in any other forum then post it here.
Forum rules
READ NOW: L2j Forums Rules of Conduct
User avatar
Gladicek
Posts: 634
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 6:25 pm
Location: Czech Republic

L2j logic...

Post by Gladicek »

Still I donť get your logic. All the time you ASK for author agreement for share. Since Gnacik wrote 2x times that it can be shared then I did it. And what happened? Of course deleted because of ????. Sorry but I donť get your logic.

Can someone who have IQ explain this ? Because I donť get it. You wrote only about that it will not be commitable but nothing about that canť be shared.

If this will happend again then I want to remove my work from your project because its only ..... me again and again. This is maybe why ppls support more others forks that L2j.

Thx for your answer and waiting for warning or something else like always.
ImageImage
L2J retired
User avatar
MELERIX
L2j Veteran
L2j Veteran
Posts: 6667
Joined: Sat Sep 23, 2006 11:31 pm
Location: Chile
Contact:

Re: L2j logic...

Post by MELERIX »

may be you forgot to read the rules: viewtopic.php?f=1&t=2
User avatar
UnAfraid
L2j Veteran
L2j Veteran
Posts: 4199
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2007 4:25 pm
Location: Bulgaria
Contact:

Re: L2j logic...

Post by UnAfraid »

Thread is moved back.
Image
User avatar
Zoey76
L2j Inner Circle
L2j Inner Circle
Posts: 7005
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 3:36 am

Re: L2j logic...

Post by Zoey76 »

I'll assume that Freya is based in leaked/stolen files, since I never saw Gnacik sharing it.

According to the rules, it won't get committed.

If you get Gnacik to post his version in forums, then we can talk again.
Powered by Eclipse 4.30 🌌 | Eclipse Temurin 21 ☕ | MariaDB 11.3.2 🗃️ | L2J Server 2.6.3.0 - High Five 🚀

🔗 Join our Discord! 🎮💬
User avatar
Gladicek
Posts: 634
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 6:25 pm
Location: Czech Republic

Re: L2j logic...

Post by Gladicek »

Zoey76 wrote:I'll assume that Freya is based in leaked/stolen files, since I never saw Gnacik sharing it.

According to the rules, it won't get committed.

If you get Gnacik to post his version in forums, then we can talk again.
When someone stolen it that donť mean that I did it too lol. I get it from L2j United dev by normal way + Gnacik give me agreement for sharing his work which I just upgraded to much more retail like. ¨

There are more scripts which are leaked and stolen and they were not removed. So what is this? You really make me angry with this.
ImageImage
L2J retired
User avatar
Zoey76
L2j Inner Circle
L2j Inner Circle
Posts: 7005
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 3:36 am

Re: L2j logic...

Post by Zoey76 »

Don't get angry, is not worth it.

Just get Gnacik to share it and it'll be all right.
Powered by Eclipse 4.30 🌌 | Eclipse Temurin 21 ☕ | MariaDB 11.3.2 🗃️ | L2J Server 2.6.3.0 - High Five 🚀

🔗 Join our Discord! 🎮💬
User avatar
Gladicek
Posts: 634
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 6:25 pm
Location: Czech Republic

Re: L2j logic...

Post by Gladicek »

Zoey76 wrote:Don't get angry, is not worth it.

Just get Gnacik to share it and it'll be all right.
Why I should get it ? He told me to share it omg. Iť same script just upgraded (better version because that before was missing some parts which I added).

He give me agreement and give agreement because it have my own parts in script. So where is problem?

BTW: Iť same like with Beleth script which commited L2j....
ImageImage
L2J retired
User avatar
MELERIX
L2j Veteran
L2j Veteran
Posts: 6667
Joined: Sat Sep 23, 2006 11:31 pm
Location: Chile
Contact:

Re: L2j logic...

Post by MELERIX »

this is simple, where is the proof ?

l2ju is a private project, so gnacik should talk here and confirm if that authorization is true.

remember that source code of leaked stuff is not allowed here, and as always will be deleted and never committed.
User avatar
Gladicek
Posts: 634
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 6:25 pm
Location: Czech Republic

Re: L2j logic...

Post by Gladicek »

MELERIX wrote:this is simple, where is the proof ?

l2ju is a private project, so gnacik should talk here and confirm if that authorization is true.

remember that source code of leaked stuff is not allowed here, and as always will be deleted and never committed.
And our server was in L2jUnited project so we were able to get source code. If you donť know nothing about this then please donť event post about it ;)

JIV and maybe even lion can confirm this...
ImageImage
L2J retired
User avatar
MELERIX
L2j Veteran
L2j Veteran
Posts: 6667
Joined: Sat Sep 23, 2006 11:31 pm
Location: Chile
Contact:

Re: L2j logic...

Post by MELERIX »

that doesn't matter, for example I can have access to another SVN project and that doesn't mean I can pikup stuff from there and share that in other forums, without authorization.

so I'm still for wating proofs, or Ganacik confirmation about if true that you are authorized to share stuff from l2ju here :roll:
User avatar
Gladicek
Posts: 634
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 6:25 pm
Location: Czech Republic

Re: L2j logic...

Post by Gladicek »

viewtopic.php?f=4&t=26635

Check this topic before you will post please. It look as that you donť read it.
ImageImage
L2J retired
User avatar
MELERIX
L2j Veteran
L2j Veteran
Posts: 6667
Joined: Sat Sep 23, 2006 11:31 pm
Location: Chile
Contact:

Re: L2j logic...

Post by MELERIX »

seems you have not readed the last answer there ? :roll:
Zoey76 wrote:I just made up my mind, like I said before none version will be committed, they aren't public, they haven't been shared by the author and they have a lot of drama behind.
lion
L2j Veteran
L2j Veteran
Posts: 967
Joined: Sun Mar 11, 2007 7:49 pm
Location: Ukraine

Re: L2j logic...

Post by lion »

Gladicek wrote: JIV and maybe even lion can confirm this...
JIV start server with wrong people thats why some people get source, and then share
User avatar
Gladicek
Posts: 634
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 6:25 pm
Location: Czech Republic

Re: L2j logic...

Post by Gladicek »

MELERIX wrote:seems you have not readed the last answer there ? :roll:
Zoey76 wrote:I just made up my mind, like I said before none version will be committed, they aren't public, they haven't been shared by the author and they have a lot of drama behind.
You wrote only about that it will not be commitable but nothing about that canť be shared.

There was leaked Beleth script (Threat version) and was not removed so how your logic work?

lion wrote:
Gladicek wrote: JIV and maybe even lion can confirm this...
JIV start server with wrong people thats why some people get source, and then share
I didnť shared anything. Only now I want to share it because Gnacik give me agreement about sharing his Freya script.
ImageImage
L2J retired
lion
L2j Veteran
L2j Veteran
Posts: 967
Joined: Sun Mar 11, 2007 7:49 pm
Location: Ukraine

Re: L2j logic...

Post by lion »

Gladicek wrote: I didnť shared anything.
i don't say it is was you. you get script - this is already leak. and our source leaked from exfire, but this is not place for talk about that, we must stop talk about this.
This script was done by Gnacik with little midification by me and Sandro. Gnacik agree share freya.java for show this is his own work.
Locked