Re: DMCA takedown
Posted: Sat Apr 09, 2016 2:50 pm
The main thing on assembla everything is OK without changes and any Takedown DMCA. 
I hope that now GitHub cant fuck me again with stupiditys...Page 5 of 11
Re: DMCA takedown
Posted: Sun Apr 10, 2016 2:53 pm
I restored my GitHub Account again... YOU WIN!!!. I hope that now GitHub cant fuck me again with stupiditys...
I hope that now GitHub cant fuck me again with stupiditys...Re: DMCA takedown
Posted: Tue Apr 12, 2016 1:36 pm
Gelo Sunday at 18:58
Hi there,
Thank you for bringing this up to us.
Please be inform that the statement that you saw and github is not associated to NCZ0ft. We will forward this to our management and will investigate this issue further.
Once again, thank you for reporting this things to us.
If you have other concern or question, please don't hesitate to inform us again.
Warmest regards,
Gelo
NCZ0ft Support Team
Re: DMCA takedown
Posted: Tue Apr 12, 2016 1:44 pm
Sounds like lord_rex was right. Digital harassment at its finest.Nik wrote:Gelo Sunday at 18:58
Hi there,
Thank you for bringing this up to us.
Please be inform that the statement that you saw and github is not associated to NCZ0ft. We will forward this to our management and will investigate this issue further.
Once again, thank you for reporting this things to us.
If you have other concern or question, please don't hesitate to inform us again.
Warmest regards,
Gelo
NCZ0ft Support Team
Re: DMCA takedown
Posted: Tue Apr 12, 2016 1:45 pm
If my crazy theory was right, then NCZ0ft shall know that someone (who uses their literally stolen files) speaking on their behalf to terminate legal emulator projects & servers which were standing as a major advertisement for years.SaveGame wrote:Sounds like lord_rex was right. Digital harassment at its finest.Nik wrote:Gelo Sunday at 18:58
Hi there,
Thank you for bringing this up to us.
Please be inform that the statement that you saw and github is not associated to NCZ0ft. We will forward this to our management and will investigate this issue further.
Once again, thank you for reporting this things to us.
If you have other concern or question, please don't hesitate to inform us again.
Warmest regards,
Gelo
NCZ0ft Support Team
Re: DMCA takedown
Posted: Tue Apr 12, 2016 2:55 pm
If you want I can provide my server to create a git server for your team.
However, I think that you already have a plan.
However, I think that you already have a plan.
Re: DMCA takedown
Posted: Tue Apr 12, 2016 8:36 pm
Any alternative way to get the source?
Re: DMCA takedown
Posted: Tue Apr 12, 2016 9:36 pm
Regardless of Nik's email, we have started legal actions to countermesure this.
This things take time, and I'm not able to say more about this at this time.
This things take time, and I'm not able to say more about this at this time.
Re: DMCA takedown
Posted: Tue Apr 12, 2016 10:14 pm
Perfect!!!... Thanks @Zoey76 for info us and @Nik for his help of course.Zoey76 wrote:Regardless of Nik's email, we have started legal actions to countermesure this.
This things take time, and I'm not able to say more about this at this time.
1000 years of //ban_char for those who send DMCA to L2J repos.
Re: DMCA takedown
Posted: Wed Apr 13, 2016 1:40 am
Not sure if contacting NCZ0ft regarding if they started anything against us is helpful..
Re: DMCA takedown
Posted: Wed Apr 13, 2016 10:52 am
I think that if NCZ0ft wants to fight with L2J.... they was pronuncied in other way more strongly... but its my opinion no more, no less. Hear similar that a man or woman that want to fuck L2J by his reasons (not fair and not logical too).Aikimaniac wrote:Not sure if contacting NCZ0ft regarding if they started anything against us is helpful..
I repeat... L2J is inder GPLv3 licenses... and nots illegal.
Re: DMCA takedown
Posted: Wed Apr 13, 2016 11:50 am
What about the content of all those HTML files, that, even when it doesn't match the content created by NC 1:1, looks exactly the same when viewed through the client?Sacrifice wrote:I think that if NCZ0ft wants to fight with L2J.... they was pronuncied in other way more strongly... but its my opinion no more, no less. Hear similar that a man or woman that want to fuck L2J by his reasons (not fair and not logical too).Aikimaniac wrote:Not sure if contacting NCZ0ft regarding if they started anything against us is helpful..
I repeat... L2J is inder GPLv3 licenses... and nots illegal.
l2jserver and l2jdp were separated for a reason. l2jdp contains thousands of files with directly or indirectly stolen content, and that would not be hard to prove in most jurisdictions.
The question is whether the legal fees required to take action against l2jdp warrant such an approach is a different one.
Re: DMCA takedown
Posted: Wed Apr 13, 2016 11:59 am
We can do whatever we want with HTMLS... till I know... HTML langage is free... otherwise is that HTMLs was obtained from... illegal methods... but that method is very very difficult and nobody want to stain his hands using sniffing methods to gather HTMS. It's my humble and frank opinion.
Re: DMCA takedown
Posted: Wed Apr 13, 2016 12:13 pm
If you see a painting and make a copy of it (or something that closely resembles the original to the viewer) [a derivative work of], using painting tools, you cannot argue that everyone can use painting tools.Sacrifice wrote:We can do whatever we want with HTMLS... till I know... HTML langage is free... otherwise is that HTMLs was obtained from... illegal methods... but that method is very very difficult and nobody want to stain his hands using sniffing methods to gather HTMS. It's my humble and frank opinion.
Because you are not charged for painting, you are charged for making unauthorized copies. We are not talking about just painting something, as in writing some HTML markup, we are talking about re-writing content that was created by someone else.
Even if you only saw the original picture in a photo (e.g. you only saw the text and it's layout through the official client), it still applies.
Re: DMCA takedown
Posted: Wed Apr 13, 2016 12:30 pm
Take a look of this...SaveGame wrote:If you see a painting and make a copy of it (or something that closely resembles the original to the viewer) [a derivative work of], using painting tools, you cannot argue that everyone can use painting tools.Sacrifice wrote:We can do whatever we want with HTMLS... till I know... HTML langage is free... otherwise is that HTMLs was obtained from... illegal methods... but that method is very very difficult and nobody want to stain his hands using sniffing methods to gather HTMS. It's my humble and frank opinion.
Because you are not charged for painting, you are charged for making unauthorized copies. We are not talking about just painting something, as in writing some HTML markup, we are talking about re-writing content that was created by someone else.
Even if you only saw the original picture in a photo (e.g. you only saw the text and it's layout through the official client), it still applies.
Assuming you're saying ... I'll tell you ... if we re-write the text ourself, is no longer equal (we re-write ourself, not copy it as is and put it as is), i mean that is not exactly the same. Its the difference between rework that L2J do and the plagiarism.
Dont know if I explained well...