Reviewers review (and test if they want, but not necassarily), testers test. Separate responsibilities.UnAfraid wrote:so they can test all on live servers
You're talking only about team members, but there are community members too.UnAfraid wrote:The only one who have live server running l2j atm is nBd.
That's why such groups should be made.UnAfraid wrote:Since he started his live server we discovered so many problems that was there and noone else reported them, that's sad..
Obviously, you should first create a poll topic in Announcements section asking people if they would be interested in joining any of those groups (possible answer variants: "I'd like to be a tester", "I'd like to be a reviewer", "I'd like to be both", "neither suits me"), because if nobody were to join there'd be no point.
There are only 3 problems with this:
1) you need to find such people
2) you need to know they will "filter out" the bad contributions decently or be able to help them develop into something good
3) you need to actually check/commit the contributions that pass their tests/reviews
But that would be far better than the current situation where someone only reviews/commits a contribution if they're in the mood (except bugfixes).