Thats okay but that again still leave the question open why than trac is on since the bugtracker part of trac dont work as effectively as it should but the forum for that reason works pretty well.Also i still dont understand why the 1changeset/month should have been done._DS_ wrote:"Open letter" is a declaration of some sort, and disabling file view in trac - way to force people to read it.
Anyone with more than 20g brain weight can get changesets from SVN, so only real dummies was harmed (and complain).
Really much worse thing is not a disabling of the FILE_VIEW, but committing all in one huge changeset.
Open Letter to L2J non-friendly forks
Forum rules
READ NOW: L2j Forums Rules of Conduct
READ NOW: L2j Forums Rules of Conduct
- Intrepid
- Posts: 59
- Joined: Thu Oct 02, 2008 9:16 am
- Location: Hungary
Re: Open Letter to L2J non-friendly forks
-
- L2j Veteran
- Posts: 3437
- Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2008 8:53 am
- Location: Russia
Re: Open Letter to L2J non-friendly forks
Another truth: 90% of tickets are useless. I'm already stop monitoring them. Most fixes done on internal testing.
Commiter of the shit
public static final int PI = 3.1415926535897932384626433832795;
public static final int PI = 3.1415926535897932384626433832795;
- Aikimaniac
- L2j Inner Circle
- Posts: 3048
- Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2005 11:42 pm
- Location: Slovakia
Re: Open Letter to L2J non-friendly forks
there is no need for you to understand it but simply accept it...thats all..this is the way how things work now... EOFIntrepid wrote:Also i still dont understand why the 1changeset/month should have been done.
- Intrepid
- Posts: 59
- Joined: Thu Oct 02, 2008 9:16 am
- Location: Hungary
Re: Open Letter to L2J non-friendly forks
Just the answer i thought i will receive no wonder why the project ended up hereAikimaniac wrote:there is no need for you to understand it but simply accept it...thats all..this is the way how things work now... EOFIntrepid wrote:Also i still dont understand why the 1changeset/month should have been done.

- Aikimaniac
- L2j Inner Circle
- Posts: 3048
- Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2005 11:42 pm
- Location: Slovakia
Re: Open Letter to L2J non-friendly forks
yeah...it ended up...died...no more development...its closed... thanks for using our airlines, enjoy your trip to Antarctis... 

- Intrepid
- Posts: 59
- Joined: Thu Oct 02, 2008 9:16 am
- Location: Hungary
Re: Open Letter to L2J non-friendly forks
funny guy well died?at this moment i dont think time will tell atleast you successfully prooved that the inner circle is not for the project but against itAikimaniac wrote:yeah...it ended up...died...no more development...its closed... thanks for using our airlines, enjoy your trip to Antarctis...

- Tan
- L2j Veteran
- Posts: 873
- Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2009 10:31 pm
- Location: Poland
Re: Open Letter to L2J non-friendly forks
WE DIED hahahahah lol best joke ive heard today.
Some people believe in God... i believe in Music... some people pray..... I turn on Winamp
http://www.last.fm/user/L2jTan
http://www.last.fm/user/L2jTan
- Aikimaniac
- L2j Inner Circle
- Posts: 3048
- Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2005 11:42 pm
- Location: Slovakia
Re: Open Letter to L2J non-friendly forks
And now im pretty sure that youre in lack of understanding that devs are volunteers who maintan and develop in their own freetime and that those arent your own slaves who do exactly what you like when you order it and that those are looking for ther best way for L2J and its future and as you wrote...time will tell. gl&hfIntrepid wrote:funny guy well died?at this moment i dont think time will tell atleast you successfully prooved that the inner circle is not for the project but against itAikimaniac wrote:yeah...it ended up...died...no more development...its closed... thanks for using our airlines, enjoy your trip to Antarctis...
- Aikimaniac
- L2j Inner Circle
- Posts: 3048
- Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2005 11:42 pm
- Location: Slovakia
Re: Open Letter to L2J non-friendly forks
and please...continue your justified crusade on IRC and leave forum without spam/flame.. thanks 
