Any solution ? or its dead !FILE_VIEW privileges are required to perform this operation
Old .diff
Forum rules
READ NOW: L2j Forums Rules of Conduct
READ NOW: L2j Forums Rules of Conduct
-
Sirpaypi
- Posts: 108
- Joined: Mon May 18, 2009 11:51 pm
- Location: Moяocco.
Old .diff
Hello, i m working on a project and i need to download some old .diff files but it says :
Saying that Java is nice because it works on all OSes is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
-
JIV
- L2j Veteran
- Posts: 1882
- Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2008 8:17 pm
- Location: Slovakia
- Contact:
Re: Old .diff
did you inserted a coin?
-
jurchiks
- Posts: 6769
- Joined: Sat Sep 19, 2009 4:16 pm
- Location: Eastern Europe
Re: Old .diff
trac is closed. sux, but what can we do?
If you have problems, FIRST TRY SOLVING THEM YOURSELF, and if you get errors, TRY TO ANALYZE THEM, and ONLY if you can't help it, THEN ask here.
Otherwise you will never learn anything if all you do is copy-paste!
Discussion breeds innovation.
Otherwise you will never learn anything if all you do is copy-paste!
Discussion breeds innovation.
-
Evilus
- Posts: 387
- Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2008 6:08 pm
Re: Old .diff
You have 2 options, compare with old files with any IDE. Or make your own trac and copy all changesets from current l2j trac. That will give you difs.jurchiks wrote:trac is closed. sux, but what can we do?
-
jurchiks
- Posts: 6769
- Joined: Sat Sep 19, 2009 4:16 pm
- Location: Eastern Europe
Re: Old .diff
OR force the l2j team to enable the trac again. I don't see absolutely any benefit from that action.
If you have problems, FIRST TRY SOLVING THEM YOURSELF, and if you get errors, TRY TO ANALYZE THEM, and ONLY if you can't help it, THEN ask here.
Otherwise you will never learn anything if all you do is copy-paste!
Discussion breeds innovation.
Otherwise you will never learn anything if all you do is copy-paste!
Discussion breeds innovation.
-
SolidSnake
- Posts: 865
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 6:54 pm
- Location: Italy
-
Evilus
- Posts: 387
- Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2008 6:08 pm
Re: Old .diff
I see the benefit for themjurchiks wrote:OR force the l2j team to enable the trac again. I don't see absolutely any benefit from that action.
, but not for the users ^^-
jurchiks
- Posts: 6769
- Joined: Sat Sep 19, 2009 4:16 pm
- Location: Eastern Europe
Re: Old .diff
@SolidSnake - your definition of spam is wrong.
@Evilus - please elaborate.
@Evilus - please elaborate.
If you have problems, FIRST TRY SOLVING THEM YOURSELF, and if you get errors, TRY TO ANALYZE THEM, and ONLY if you can't help it, THEN ask here.
Otherwise you will never learn anything if all you do is copy-paste!
Discussion breeds innovation.
Otherwise you will never learn anything if all you do is copy-paste!
Discussion breeds innovation.
-
SolidSnake
- Posts: 865
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 6:54 pm
- Location: Italy
-
Sirpaypi
- Posts: 108
- Joined: Mon May 18, 2009 11:51 pm
- Location: Moяocco.
Re: Old .diff
Yes !JIV wrote:did you inserted a coin?
Anyway i found a solution...
Saying that Java is nice because it works on all OSes is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
-
web
- Posts: 32
- Joined: Wed Jul 08, 2009 3:09 am
Re: Old .diff
you can always use tortoise SVN and compare two revs in unified diff. I had the same problem but i managed to get around.
-
Sirpaypi
- Posts: 108
- Joined: Mon May 18, 2009 11:51 pm
- Location: Moяocco.
Re: Old .diff
Yes there's lot of ways to do it but stilll useless to disable trac just like that...web wrote:you can always use tortoise SVN and compare two revs in unified diff. I had the same problem but i managed to get around.
We can't even see the 1 file diff...
Saying that Java is nice because it works on all OSes is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.