What is more important to run the server?
Processor, Memory or HD Speed?
I know that the ideal is have all.
But, i wonder what that reduces the lag on the server.
What is a good host?
Thx for attention.
And Sorry my bad english.
What is more important?
Forum rules
READ NOW: L2j Forums Rules of Conduct
READ NOW: L2j Forums Rules of Conduct
-
LaraCroft
- Posts: 360
- Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 1:37 am
What is more important?
I need a help.
What is more important to run the server?
Processor, Memory or HD Speed?
I know that the ideal is have all.
But, i wonder what that reduces the lag on the server.
What is a good host?
Thx for attention.
And Sorry my bad english.
What is more important to run the server?
Processor, Memory or HD Speed?
I know that the ideal is have all.
But, i wonder what that reduces the lag on the server.
What is a good host?
Thx for attention.
And Sorry my bad english.
!!!knowledge and intelligence must be shared!!!
-
toastgodsupreme
- Posts: 750
- Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 7:01 pm
- Location: Poland
Re: What is more important?
I'd say get 8gb of ram, at least a dual core processor, and if you can afford it, an SSD HD.
Anything beyond that is just nice. But that setup will handle a decent load.
Anything beyond that is just nice. But that setup will handle a decent load.
-
lishawj
- Posts: 253
- Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 12:29 am
Re: What is more important?
Along similar concerns about performance, I had been wondering about network performance pertaining to upload bandwidth (server to client). Currently I am using 100Mb up and down so it's hard for me to tell any difference but I had began to wonder how many players can a certain upload bandwidth support efficiently.
My current bandwidth is quite stable for 200 players and I believe it may be an overkill actually. Does anyone have experience with varying upload bandwidth and how many players it may effectively support? I am looking to cut cost a bit and want to know which communication bandwidth range will still efficiently support 200-400 players.
200 players = ???
300 players = ???
etc.
Again, I have roughly 210 active players during peak time on 100Mb and network performance monitor shows no signs of stress. Any advice is will be greatly appreciated.
My current bandwidth is quite stable for 200 players and I believe it may be an overkill actually. Does anyone have experience with varying upload bandwidth and how many players it may effectively support? I am looking to cut cost a bit and want to know which communication bandwidth range will still efficiently support 200-400 players.
200 players = ???
300 players = ???
etc.
Again, I have roughly 210 active players during peak time on 100Mb and network performance monitor shows no signs of stress. Any advice is will be greatly appreciated.